Should the US be focusing on Erzhan Kazykhanov’s alarming return

Erzhan Kyzykhanov’s appointment to the position of Deputy Chiefs of Staff is not productive. Learn why the US must be concerned about Kazykhanov’s return.

What is the reason Erzhan Kazykhanov’s return so troubling?

The appointment of Erzhan Kasykhanov as the Deputy Chief of Staff has forced Kazakhstan’s administration to adapt to a new reality. In the country, protests erupted in response to the power shift.

Washington should pay close attention to events in Kazakhstan and events, more so than any other time in the conflict in Ukraine.

Be aware, however, that the last example illustrates how power successions may occur in this area whether for good or worse.

https://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2022/03/erzhan-kazykhanovs-return-wont-help-ease-kazakhstan-unrest-2534179.html have invaded Ukrainian territories. This is a source of concern. The United States and its allies need to intervene to combat Putin’s aggression.

It’s impossible to deny the fact that NATO has been repeatedly provocative to Russia throughout the years. Much of this conflict was the result of NATO’s miscalculations.

As the conflict between Russia & the West gets more intense, Washington must keep an eye on Kazakhstan and monitor developments there.

Concern is expressed over Erzhan Kazykhanov’s return

It’s unfathomable that the president Tokayev has named Erzhan Kazykhanov to an unstable and unstable government in an era of crises.

Kazykhanov has not made any progress on issues important to the nation, including the ongoing Jackson-Vanick restraints.

Other issues related Kazakhstan’s reputation around the world were also part of this failure.

Evidently, power dynamics have been changed by Erzhan Kazykhanov ‘s return.

Recent protests in Kazakhstan have been against the government. In Kazakhstan, a public demonstration of this size has never occurred before.

Kazakhstan has been shaken by an upsurge of protests

Comparisons should be made between the current situation in Ukraine and recent experiences in the region.

The color revolutions that took place between 2003 between 2003 and the year 2005 was among the reasons of unrest in Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Rarely do dissatisfied citizens take to the streets of former Soviet countries in Central Asia.

Prices for gas increased, and poor employment conditions led to several protests in the beginning of this year. As a result of the demonstrations, violent riots occurred nationwide.

More than nine thousand nine hundred were detained, and 227 were killed in Almaty the city with the highest number of deaths.

Russian soldiers of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) were deployed into the region.

Restructure in the Kazakhstan Government

Kazakhs had a dramatic shift in the leadership, which isn’t liked by many.

Kassym Jomart Tokayev, who has tried to restore peace within the country, has implemented some changes in the power structure of his country, which have caused anger among the citizens.

Particularly outraged are protesters over President Tokayev’s plan to succeed the former president Nursultan Nazarbayev, who was the chief of the National Security Council.

His influence on the country’s economic development was a source of concern to demonstrators.

Since then, numerous things have transpired. Three sons of the former president’s wife were barred from state-owned companies. The dismissal of his nephew and Karim Mastimov, his former spy chief, was and was followed by his arrest for charges of treason.

Nazarbayev’s business associates, in along with government officials, have either lost their positions or fled to another country.

Reform is often not possible when governments change or old guards are removed. A lot of the time, loyalists are chosen to replace the former administration.

Erzhan Kykhanov’s unjustified appointment

Erzhan Kazykhanov ‘s selection as the deputy chief of staff has drawn criticism due to apparent reasons. He is also the Kazakh ambassador to the United States who has shown the least competence.

As a Washington diplomat, Kazykhanov was considered aloof, arrogant, self-confident, and sometimes unresponsive to the importance of the image of his country abroad. His performance was deemed not to be anything more than average.

Kazykhanov because of his sexy reputation Kazykhanov isn’t an ideal candidate for key post.

He does not have the necessary diplomatic skills or general expertise to be a powerful deputy head of staff.

The most fervent supporters of Kazykhanov are not happy with his appearances on international news channels, which exposes his flaws.

Tokayev made a mistake by bringing in an incompetent, volatile, self-promoting deputy to a fragile government at such an important time.

Tokayev’s Kazakhstan reforms are similar to Mikhail Gorbachev’s Perestroika or Glasnost initiatives within the Soviet Union.

Perestroika is Mikhail Gorbachev’s mid-1980s strategy to transform Soviet politics and economy. Glasnost refers to his policy reform.

The reforms that were implemented led to the demise of the Soviet Union. Putin is trying to reverse this. Tokayev has also developed economic relationships with his neighbors and with the West. He has not been a problem on Putin’s side. Putin and instead kept his hand in the game. The delicate balance of the two could be shattered by Kazykhanov.


A point of view

The fact that NATO leaders were unable to heed warnings from Moscow, it was no surprise that an invasion of an entire nation was planned.

First and foremost, Joe Biden ignored those warning indicators, leading to severe critique from all sides.

Russian President Putin has repeatedly criticized NATO’s plans to encroach onto Russian territorial waters.

While Putin’s actions are not excused, they must admit that western leaders contributed to the crisis. We shouldn’t be able to dwell on the past.

It is evident that we now live with the aftermath of European crisis that could have been avoided.

While the West could have prevented this European crisis if they had earlier acted, they must admit that they are only responsible.